Yeh, I can dig that . Lot's of public opinions & info to take in & then , to make sense of // perhaps it is best to run with those offering the most support .Originally Posted by John
<> cheers
Hey Earl, Thanks for your support and interest. That is what I was originally going to do but it is just too difficult that way.When it comes to building a speaker from scratch I'm literally learning this on the fly.And I'm trying to juggle my business and this project at once.I can't afford any distractions at all.
If you would like the data when I'm done, I would be more than happy to send to you or to anyone who would like it Privately !! I just want to remain Neutral :2thumbsup:.
BTW Pano is a tremendous teacher so is GM for that matter ! I only hope that I can be as good of a student as they are teachers.
Yeh, I can dig that . Lot's of public opinions & info to take in & then , to make sense of // perhaps it is best to run with those offering the most support .
<> cheers
Bfish, it's not the info that is objected to. The info is valuable. It's the stinky wrapper that it's delivered in that causes protest.
We'll post measurements here when they are ready. There is a steep learning curve when you are new to measuring. Details need to be sorted first.
Or reading it after you said you'd go away? How are they different? :doh:
Was just trying to point out that the method, not the message was ill received. But there is no pleasing you, so I don't worry about it any more. "No big woop."
Earl your input is always welcome. But I have no way of getting in touch w/you.
Well I guess I wasn't the only one.quote=Panomaniac;1833439]Bfish, it's not the info that is objected to. The info is valuable. It's the stinky wrapper that it's delivered in that causes protest.
This thread seems to be fueled by an acute over-sensitivity to others input and an almost obsessive need to make it fit with a how-I-want-to-hear-it mentality, and a lack of a sense of humour. Hey, it's only a loudspeaker project. :doh:
Marshall.
Yeah, this is my take on all this. Having been on all manner of forums since '96, each major dip in the economy has been mirrored in them with such 'insanity'.
GM
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
Agreed, I started to make a witty riposte plus regurgitate my 288B/805 HF experience and the way I resolved it when you had just posted your thoughts since this is a subject that is part n' parcel to any discussion where someone claims they want the 'best' practical sound reproduction; but as has become the norm for me, got sidetracked/busy with my so called life and for once glad I did because if yours was delivered in a stinky wrapper, mine would probably been perceived as being presented buried in a truckload of dead babies.
Guess yours and mine's Wayne's World' brand of sense of humor is a bit too wacky/'tongue in cheek' around here these days.
GM
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
This does seem to be a "grumpy old man" forum. But it's not the only one.
GM, I've got you by about 10 years on forums and have also seen plenty. There seems be those who can give advice well, and those who can't. It's not the advice itself, it's the more the tone or how it's stated. And not one remark here or there, but a style or history of posts. This is true an any and all forums. I have not seen the economy influence that, but maybe I wasn't looking for it.
Forums are not face to face meetings, in case someone had not noticed, so it can be difficult to interpret what is said and meant. Surely you guys know this by now. Some of you may be autistic, but certainty not all.
A little diplomacy and forethought can go a long way, that's all I'm saying.
OK, back to speakers.
You'll need it. The above was obviously a joke. It even had a winky.
Laughter is the best medicine, right? :lol:
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks